Reading Response

September 15, 2008

In “Refusing to Hope in a God of Technology”, Jeff Dietrich states that people are too readily accepting technology and will soon forget what face-to-face communication is like. I agree with this. The world only looks at the convenience and benefits that technology brings, we ignore the negative affects. Dietrich also talks about how all this constant changing will leave the poor behind. I believe this is true as well. We cannot possibly expect everyone to be able to keep up with the ever-changing technology. What happens when the intelligent, middle to lower-class individuals aren’t allowed, or able to express their opinions or to be of the technological age we are in? They are left out or at least discouraged. As and example, in high school I wrote a lot of papers, essays, and had to do other activities that were computer related. Most of my teachers would not accept essays that were not typed. A child without access to a computer outside of school would have a hard time completing these assignments. These children would be forced to finish their assignments in class, which would lessen the quality of their work by rushing them to get things done. Also, another problem students face is motivation. If a child has to choose between hurrying to get something done or not getting it done, they are less likely to get their assignments done. While it would be hard for schools to receive enough funding to give every child a laptop or computer, it is the only way to level the playing field for all students. America should be concerned about this. This country should be about including everyone, having equal rights and opportunity. This is not to say that technology should be rejected or shunned. It is a major advantage and convenience for the world. We should accept it, but not rely on it as much as we do now. We can use technology and reap the benefits of it but we need to also be prepared for the negative repercussions and work to provide access to everyone. Technology can be a good thing if we use it the right way.

Advertisement

3 Responses to “Reading Response”

  1. Alyson Tucker said

    Good job. I agree with what you are saying. It flows well and is believable. The only thing I can think to add is maybe tell some things that might happen to the people that are left out of the technology. What might they struggle with?

  2. triples89 said

    The last sentence didn’t flow with the rest of the essay. It seemed like it should be a transition sentence into another paragraph. Also, I didn’t like the use of a question in the middle of the essay. If you changed that to a statement, it would make that part stronger.

  3. bcash said

    Use of a little more evidence to support your beliefs could improve this. Also, I agree with the previous comment with the question in the middle. It would be stronger as a statement. The overall response is easy to follow.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.